The takeover provisions set out in Chapter 6 of the Corporations Act are rather complex, but I have attempted a brief summary below.

The basic tenet – as enunciated in CA Section 602 – is to ensure control of a company does not pass or increase other than in a way that is fair to all other shareholders.


Basically, the Act [Sec 606] prohibits the acquisition by any entity/group – company, trust, individual, etc (“bidder”) of a relevant interest in shares/securities in a company (“target”) where it would:

  • take the bidder’s holding (voting power) over 20%; or
  • increase the holding between 20% and 90%

if the target:

  • is stock exchange listed; or
  • if unlisted – has more than 50 shareholders (regardless of whether it is a Public or Pty Ltd company)

unless it makes a takeover bid.

The relevant interest threshold(s) could be breached in various ways – such as through purchase (from another holder) or allotment (of a new issue by the board). Alternative ways include conversion of non-voting preference shares into ordinary (voting) shares or increased voting rights on existing shares [Sec 606(6)].

A “relevant interest” is defined [Sec 608] as including shares held by the bidder plus those over which he has power to control in any way “… directly or indirectly … express or implied, formal or informal, exercisable alone or jointly …” or which are held by another entity in which his voting power is greater than 20%.

The 20% threshold level – in Sec 606 – is seen as where a shareholder may be able to control/ block the decision of a general meeting. The 90% level is seen as effectively having total control of a company.


There are, however, some exceptions [Sec 611] to which the above does not apply, including acquisitions:

  • of no more than 3% each 6 months
  • approved by the shareholders in general meeting
  • resulting from rights not taken up by others under a pro rata issue
  • from underwriting
  • effectively caused by not accepting a buy-back
  • with ASIC’s consent.


If a bidder is to exceed the above limits and cannot take advantage of an exception then generally he is obliged to make a takeover bid – either for all other, or a proportional number of, shares.

The various processes available, conditions and requirements are set out in Chapter 6 of the CA. These usually include preparation and dissemination of bidder’s and target’s written statements which must also be lodged with and approved by ASIC.

Once a bidder controls 90% of the shares it may compulsorily acquire the balance.


Notwithstanding the specific provisions relating to takeovers, there are other ways that a shareholder can gain/increase control such as:

  • transactions which involve the cancellation of shares [held by others] under a buy-back or other reduction in capital
  • a scheme of arrangement approved by the court in compliance with Sec 411(17).

*Originally written by Company Secretary, an Australian virtual company secretary service.

Previous articleTakeover Approach – Issues
Next articleTrading Halts

Most Popular

How Many Hours Do Lawyers Work?

In the media, we often see lawyers in suits gracing the court halls bringing criminals to justice. However, what we do not...

How Much Do Lawyers Make?

Lawyers are often portrayed to be rich males and females in suits debating and fighting in court. Unfortunately, the media’s portrayal of...

Why Do People Hate Lawyers

Time, accuracy, and complete prudence are three of the most vitally crucial factors that lawyers have to observe and follow. Every lawyer...

What Do Criminal Lawyers Do

Among the many areas in law, criminal cases are the most popular in incriminating and discriminating nature. These types of legal proceedings...

Recent Comments